301 Geniuses - AssessmentPsychology.com (2024)

Based on Catharine Morris Cox. (1926) The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses.
Genetic Studies of Genius
(Vol. II). Stanford University Press.

20 Selected Geniuses... [More]

Name

DatesYears Lived

Nationality

Eminence

Average Reliability Grade**Obtained Est. IQ*Corrected Est. IQ*
Adams, John Quincy1767-184881Americanstatesman3.0165175
Balzac, Honoré de1799-185051Frenchwriter3.5145155
Beethoven, Ludwig van1770-182757Germanmusician5.5140165
Copernicus, Nicolas1473-154370Prussian***scientist5.5130160
Da Vinci, Leonardo1452-151967Italianartist6.0150180
Descartes, René1596-165054Frenchphilosopher4.5160180
Emerson, Ralph Waldo1803-188279Americanwriter3.5145155
Franklin, Benjamin1706-179084Americanstatesman4.5145160
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von1749-183283Germanwriter3.0200210
Handel, George Frideric1685-175974Germanmusician4.5155170
Jefferson, Thomas1743-182683Americanstatesman4.0150160
Johnson, Samuel1709-178475Englishwriter4.0155165
Kant, Immanuel1724-180480Germanphilosopher5.5145175
Lincoln, Abraham1809-186556Americanstatesman4.0140150
Mill, John Stuart1806-187367Englishphilosopher3.0170180
Napoleon Bonaparte1769-182152Frenchsoldier3.5140145
Newton, Isaac1642-172785Englishscientist4.5170190
Pascal, Blaise1623-166239Frenchscientist3.5180195
Rembrandt van Rijn1606-166963Dutchartist5.5135155
Spinoza, Baruch de1632-167745Dutchphilosopher5.5145175
Voltaire, Arouet de1694-177884Frenchwriter3.5180190

* IQ scores are based on ratings of individual case histories of the behavior and performance of 301 eminent young men and women, between 17 and 26 years of age, born 1450 to 1850, prepared from 1,500 biographical sources, reported as estimated intelligence quotients based onThe Stanford Revision of the Binet-Simon Intelligence Scale, and corrected for regression to the mean. (See Genius: An Overview)

** These are the average grades assigned by raters who rated the reliability of the data of each of the cases on the following seven point scale:

Grade 1. Rating based on data equal to a Stanford-Binet test.

Grade 2. Rating based on data for which standardize norms are available or which are closely correlated with Stanford-Binet norms. (Example: Galton.)

Grade 3. Rating based on documentary evidence combined with diagnostic descriptive material. (Example: John Quincy Adams.)

Grade 4. Rating based on less satisfactory documentary evidence and descriptive material, or on descriptive material (definite statements as to school rank, etc.) without documents. (Example: Melanchthon.)

Grade 5. Rating based on general descriptive material. General statements of superiority (or inferiority) or of school standing, intellectual interests, etc. (Example: Fénelon.)

Grade 6. Rating based on slight evidence. Standing of the family combined with a statement as to school attendance. (Example: Bernadotte.)

Grade 7. Guess, based on no data. (Example: Drake.)

*** Cox listed Copernicus' nationality as Prussian, a designation that is not without controversy, since he is regarded today as one of Poland's greatest geniuses. His birthplace, Torun (Thorn), was in Royal Prussia, now Poland, and was part of the Prussian Confederation at the time of his birth. According to Wikipedia, his native language was German, his working language was Latin, and there are no extant letters written by Copernicus in Polish, only German and Latin.

Sources: Wikipedia.comCopernicus' Nationality and Answers.comRoyal Prussia

More Tables

Issues

The Flynn Effect
Charles Graham and Jonathan Plucker
Indiana University

In his study of IQ tests scores for different populations over the past sixty years, James R. Flynn discovered that IQ scores increased from one generation to the next for all of the countries for which data existed (Flynn, 1994). This interesting phenomena has been called "the Flynn Effect." Many of the questions about why this effect occurs have not yet been answered by researchers. This site attempts to explain the issues involved in a way that will better help you to understand the Flynn Effect. It also provides references for further inquiry.

More on the Flynn Effect

Renorming IQ tests due to Flynn effect may have unintended consequences

Making IQ tests harder has educational, financial, legal and military recruiting implications

WASHINGTON -- The steady rising of IQ scores over the last century – known as the Flynn effect – causes IQ tests norms to become obsolete over time. To counter this effect, IQ tests are "renormed" (made harder) every 15-20 years by resetting the mean score to 100 to account for the previous gains in IQ scores. But according to new research, such renorming may have unintended consequences, particularly in the area of special education placements for children with borderline or mild mental retardation. The findings are reported on in the October issue of American Psychologist, a journal of the American Psychological Association (APA).

More on Renorming IQ Tests

301 Geniuses - AssessmentPsychology.com (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Maia Crooks Jr

Last Updated:

Views: 6310

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (63 voted)

Reviews: 86% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Maia Crooks Jr

Birthday: 1997-09-21

Address: 93119 Joseph Street, Peggyfurt, NC 11582

Phone: +2983088926881

Job: Principal Design Liaison

Hobby: Web surfing, Skiing, role-playing games, Sketching, Polo, Sewing, Genealogy

Introduction: My name is Maia Crooks Jr, I am a homely, joyous, shiny, successful, hilarious, thoughtful, joyous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.